NYT Krugman wrote only several weeks ago of the scientists that have been 'captured,' often unawares, by the power culture, octopus-like (sorry octopus) that reaches everywhere to tempt otherwise decent scientists with greed, lust and fear, their handmaden. This guy, from a NY university?
This article is an abomination, a propaganda job for natural gas:
Everywhere in the article that he says natural gas is the savior you can plug in wind and sun (PV and concentrated) and it is just as true.
ZERO mention of the wreckage costs of either CO2 or NATURAL GAS SEEPAGE.
No mention that without massive and huge natural gas/fracking regulation natural gas is as dirty as coal, or dirtier.
Just a gloss over that natural gas seals all the funding from the true answers - wind and sun.
And nowhere on NYT to post comments like this.
WRITE LETTERS TO THE NYT EDITOR. I tried, but one needs to give a phone number and I haven't one.
| New York Times - |
The International Energy Agency has made it clear that, under current energy policies, the door is closing on our attempts to contain the carbon-driven rise in global temperatures to within 2 degrees Celsius (3.6 Fahrenheit) by the middle of the ...
No comments:
Post a Comment